Good Morning,
after investigating the facts I have to change my opinion ;)
I believe that PDO is the way to go. In PHP 5.3 there is the option
that PDO uses mysqlnd also, therefore - if used properly the
advantages of the "zval" support are there. Nevertheless there are
some flaws when using the new PDO as zval is not support everywhere.
A good explananation can be found in the Blog of Ulf Wendel - even
tough this is an old posting everything important is explained there.
http://blog.ulf-wendel.de/?p=193
d.
Am 13.07.2009 um 18:49 schrieb Christopher Simon:
PDO has a few flaws which are addressed in PDO2 which is (afaik)
still under
development. And it might be as well that PDP2 is not compatible or
won't be finished
soon.
The tendency is going towards to be backwards compatible with PDOv1
and to replace current ADOdb functionality -> it's quite suitable.
Using the native driver and a own wrapper would surely improve OXID,
but PDO might be increase performance. It would still be less work
to fit PDO into OXID and its needs, than write an own abstraction
layer based on mysql or mysqli.
Which flaws do you mean exactly?
Best regards,
Christopher Simon
_______________________________________________
dev-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general
_______________________________________________
dev-general mailing list
[email protected]
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general
