Hi Marco, > notes. Hope you recognized the wind of change of the past > months/weeks. :-)
I did ... - and hope it'll keep blowing! ;-) > >From a legal point of view - and this should be the only and lonely > criterion - I would propose ... >From a legal point of view there cannot be any "proposal". This has to be >properly investigated and at the end of the day there has to be a reliable >statemet of how things have to be done. > - oxremarks would appear in oxorder as well I don't think that the order remarks have been meant here ... - but I might be wrong. > - as there would not be any oxuser entry, the unregistered user cannot > have a history or related stuff For several purposes many shop owners do want to have such history of unregistered users. But as I said above: Make sure that we soon get a reliable legal statement for that. > In my opinion, this is not just a dirty workaround but a legal > requirement. If we consequently implemented it like proposed, of course, > a couple of problems would come up, especially for existing interfaces > that used oxuser instead of oxorder for gathering data before. Exactly. And another thing is that customers get a new customer number each time they order (if not registered). Actually I doubt that this is an oblogatory legal request. As I said: first pleyse check out the definite legal conditions. And then let's see what's up for the code. Regards Andreas _______________________________________________ dev-general mailing list [email protected] http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.php.oxid.general
