Well you won't like it too much when I rename the app to StumbleFox. That aside, we will see where this leads, my impression is that no one is handing over the keys to store as easily as we would like, and it would facilitate the process if we weren't using the Mozilla account name.
On Oct 2, 2014, at 6:01 PM, Bradford Lassey <[email protected]> wrote: > Firefox is the brand we care about. There is no quality bar requirement > associated with Mozilla. > > > On 10/2/14, 5:52 PM, Garvan Keeley wrote: >>> On 10/2/14, 5:26 PM, Garvan Keeley wrote: >>>> 1) 99.9% of people downloading Fennec should not be downloading the >>>> Stumbler. And we don't have a plan to ensure that there won't be confusion >>>> as to who the app is for. >>> How does the account effect that? >> The belief is, average consumer sees Fennec in the play store and the only >> other product they see is stumbler, they assume it applies to them because >> Mozilla branded products are for the masses. They download stumbler under >> the false assumption the app applies to them, are unhappy, and this devalues >> the Mozilla brand. >> >>>> 2) Lack of resources: it doesn't have the level of branding, testing, >>>> design, and long-term resource planning that is expected of a Mozilla >>>> branded app. >>> Again, I don't think this is related to the account that posts it. >> I am not clear whether it is that Mozilla the play store name is not >> equivalent to the Mozilla the brand name is what you disagree with, >> or, is that the Mozilla brand name doesn't mean what I am to understand it >> means, or, >> whether we should be trying to align stumbler with the brand. >> > _______________________________________________ dev-geolocation mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-geolocation
