A) We store the workitems in the magnolia way (same structure as
paragraphs) this allows to use the dialogs to manipulate them
(currently they are stored unfortunately as plain xml)

this will not only allow usage of standard dialogs but also will facilitate proper searching within workitems.



On Sep 6, 2006, at 11:40 AM, John Mettraux wrote:

Hi Philipp,

On 9/6/06, Philipp Bracher <[email protected]> wrote:

Future solutions
----------------
A) We store the workitems in the magnolia way (same structure as
paragraphs) this allows to use the dialogs to manipulate them
(currently they are stored unfortunately as plain xml)

B) We refactore the dialogs so that they read and store from any
object (discussed here since a long time)

C) Support the solution above (deliver such a dialog and save handler
implementation)

B is planed for 3.5 and A) would be wise anyway. C) could get done if
you help to implement it

Nicolas & John: what do you think about A) should we enforce that? I
think there are other use-cases where we would like to have that

I'd love A) if workitems were stored "à la JCR" i.e. not relying on
any Magnolia layer. I think there are no counter-indications, aren't
they ?

It's one of my goal for OpenWFE to have a storage mecha for
expressions and workitems based directly on the JCR.


Best regards,

-- 
John Mettraux   -///-   http://jmettraux.openwfe.org

----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
----------------------------------------------------------------

Regards,

Sameer Charles
Magnolia International Ltd.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]     http://www.magnolia.info
Magnolia®  - Simple Enterprise Content Management
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------






Reply via email to