On Sep 6, 2006, at 11:40 AM, John Mettraux wrote:
Hi Philipp,
On 9/6/06, Philipp Bracher <[email protected]> wrote:
Future solutions
----------------
A) We store the workitems in the magnolia way (same structure as
paragraphs) this allows to use the dialogs to manipulate them
(currently they are stored unfortunately as plain xml)
B) We refactore the dialogs so that they read and store from any
object (discussed here since a long time)
C) Support the solution above (deliver such a dialog and save handler
implementation)
B is planed for 3.5 and A) would be wise anyway. C) could get done if
you help to implement it
Nicolas & John: what do you think about A) should we enforce that? I
think there are other use-cases where we would like to have that
I'd love A) if workitems were stored "à la JCR" i.e. not relying on
any Magnolia layer. I think there are no counter-indications, aren't
they ?
Well because of the nodetypes (content, contentnode, the way
multivalues are stored) but this would be solvable.
----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/developer.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
