Am Mittwoch, 6. September 2006 11:40 schrieb John Mettraux: > Hi Philipp, > > On 9/6/06, Philipp Bracher <[email protected]> wrote: > > Future solutions > > ---------------- > > A) We store the workitems in the magnolia way (same structure as > > paragraphs) this allows to use the dialogs to manipulate them > > (currently they are stored unfortunately as plain xml) > > > > B) We refactore the dialogs so that they read and store from any > > object (discussed here since a long time) > > > > C) Support the solution above (deliver such a dialog and save handler > > implementation) > > > > B is planed for 3.5 and A) would be wise anyway. C) could get done if > > you help to implement it > > > > Nicolas & John: what do you think about A) should we enforce that? I > > think there are other use-cases where we would like to have that > > I'd love A) if workitems were stored "à la JCR" i.e. not relying on > any Magnolia layer. I think there are no counter-indications, aren't > they ?
Wouldn't direct access using the JCR api lead to bypassing all the access controls built into the Magnolia layer? > > It's one of my goal for OpenWFE to have a storage mecha for > expressions and workitems based directly on the JCR. > > > Best regards, ---------------------------------------------------------------- for list details see http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/developer.html ----------------------------------------------------------------
