Hi,
On 10/25/07, Grégory Joseph <[email protected]> wrote:
> If they're breaking/broken, then let's fix that instead of burrying
> our heads in the sand by switching to absolute links by default :-p
well, using absolute links IS the fix, but it involves a change that
needs to be discussed ;)
The other option is to drop all the code we are using now to calculate
relative links and rewrite it in order to make links relative to *the
current url*, not the current node (the concept of using the current
node for calculating links is totally broken if we don't have a one to
one mapping between url and pages)... Anyway, I found out that in case
of virtual URIs, forward, include and error pages is not always easy
to find out the displayed url.
> Other than that, like Philipp, I think it should be a configurable
> thing and it's the responsibility of the site/template author to
> decide what links she wants, not Magnolia's.
so, a new property in magnolia.properties is ok for you?
fabrizio
----------------------------------------------------------------
for list details see
http://documentation.magnolia.info/docs/en/editor/stayupdated.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
