< I think the OpenSRS approach to software releases needs a bit of
< reexamination. Why go to the trouble of doing things one way,
< only to have
< RSP's tell you it's not what _they_ had in mind? This surely must end up
< requiring more work in the long run, leading to more delays in feature
< releases. Why not lay your cards on the table and publish timelines and
< planned features? Missing release deadlines isn't so bad as
< keeping RSP's
< guessing as to when features will happen and then surprising
< them with the
< results.
Actually Jim, the current renewals process is based on feedback culled from
heavy consultation with the denizens of this very list. Scott spent a great
deal of time working through the various issues with our resellers. For full
details, check back through the archives.