Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/30/12 4:43 PM, Neil wrote:
(I would actually expect the proto of an Xray for a content object to
be an [xpconnect wrapped native prototype]
If you expect that for WebIDL objects... you're going to be
disappointed. ;)
Yeah, well I still wish Xrays had been implemented as completely
distinct wrappers for the underlying C++ object, with
XPCNativeWrapper.unwrap() and wrap() the only links between the two sets
of wrappers. I don't know whether that would have an equivalent in
WebIDL though.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
