I don't follow what you have in mind. Assuming that you suggest we move to sqlite, you seem to be suggesting that we should considerably increase the amount of I/O. Or do I misunderstand what you say?
Also, readability of sqlite being better than that of json is quite debatable. Best regards, David On 28/06/14 18:18, Tobias Besemer wrote: > OK, I made a short test with: > sqlite3.exe places.sqlite ".dump" >places.dump > > It creates in my case a file with ~9.5MB. > But it is really fast !!! :D > Also it is much better readable with an editor then JSON and can be used in > any other program that can handle SQL ... > > I think 3MB more for each backup is OK ... > Better - if HD is a prob - just make 10 backups then 15 ... IMHO ... > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > -- David Rajchenbach-Teller, PhD Performance Team, Mozilla
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
