On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Till Schneidereit
<t...@tillschneidereit.net> wrote:
> That seems likely, yes. Being responsible for this particular regression, I
> can say that neither is it at all related to the other bugs mentioned, nor
> can it reasonably be interpreted as a sign of decreasing attention to
> quality: the patch I landed triggered a preexisting bug in a way that was
> pretty much unforeseeable and, because we didn't know about it, wasn't
> covered by our test suite. While the result was particularly bad - and I
> apologize for that - I don't see what I could've done better to catch it
> before landing.

I'm not talking about any specific issues, I was just wondering if
others were seeing a trend.

> (From four or so years of experience running Nightly as my main browser, I
> can say that every now and again things seem to come to a head, with
> multiple annoying issues occurring in a short time frame. I'm pretty sure
> that that's always [or almost always] purely by chance, and reading too much
> into it isn't warranted. Neither does it make sense to pat ourselves on the
> shoulder too much in the stretches of unusual stability we also have on the
> Nightly channel.)

That makes sense.

Cheers,

Dirkjan
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to