On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 02:27:31PM +0800, Xidorn Quan wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Martin Thomson <m...@mozilla.com> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Xidorn Quan <quanxunz...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > Could we probably restrict it to non-release builds (aurora and > nightly) > > > > rather than restrict them to debug builds only? Debug builds are > harder > > > to > > > > get, and are slow. > > > > > > That was suggested, but we decided against it in bug 1188657. I think > > > that we'd be happy to land a patch that restored this if there was > > > enough demand. Maybe I'm unusual, but I just run debug builds when I > > > want to investigate this sort of thing. > > > > > > > I don't think anyone other than browser developers would be willing to > > build browser themselves. I myself don't even usually build the browser > in > > my personal laptop, and I certainly won't build it just for analysing the > > traffic... > > Very few developers will need to analyze traffic at a level requiring > SSLKEYLOGFILE. In most cases, you get well enough in Firefox's builtin > developer tools. And even if that's not enough, you can get NSS from a > debug build, stick it into a non debug build, and use SSLKEYLOGFILE. > (presumably, one only needs libssl3.so/libssl3.dylib/ssl3.dll) > Probably not so many developers need to analyze traffic frequently, but people may occasionally want to use it, e.g., to learn how browser works in some cases. - Xidorn _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
