On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Chris Peterson <cpeter...@mozilla.com>
wrote:

> On 10/21/2016 3:11 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
>
>> > Does this mean that we'd be breaking one in 5 geolocation requests as a
>>> > result of this?  That seems super high.  :(
>>>
>> Agreed. For example, my understanding is that this will break
>> http://www.nextbus.com/ (and thus http://www.nextmuni.com/ ) location
>> awareness (useful for us SF folks), which is kind of essential for
>> having it tell you transit stops near you. -t
>>
>
> Indeed, the geolocation feature on nextbus.com is broken in Chrome. (The
> site shows a geolocation error message on first use.)
>
> Next Bus already has an HTTPS version of their site, but it is not the
> default and has some mixed-content warnings. For a site that uses
> geolocation as a core part of its service, I'm surprised they have let it
> stay broken in Chrome for six months. Chrome removed insecure geolocation
> in April 2016 and announced its deprecation in November 2015.


This is actually the bigger point than the telemetry point: The sites we
would break with this change have already been broken for six months in
Chrome and for four months in WebKit.  This is not something where we
should be standing on principle and bravely being different from other
browsers; in fact quite the opposite.

--Richard
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to