On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 11:45:21AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 09:29:45AM +0100, Gervase Markham wrote:
> > On 02/09/16 16:21, Peter Bowen wrote:
> > > It seems then there is a newly exposed bug.
> > > https://www.censys.io/certificates/e2665bb07940b5bee73145f47c99dcf5781edbe9d78f9cada8f1d702d5e340ad
> > > shows a certificate issued by your CA that has a notBefore in March
> > > 2015.  It does not appear in the CT log.  However another certificate
> > > with identical serial number and subject, but different Validity, does
> > > appear in the log.
> > 
> > https://crt.sh/?id=30326062 appears in the log; I assume that's the cert
> > you mean.
> > 
> > > Are you aware of a bug where you were issuing certificates identical
> > > except for validity period?
> > 
> > Well, the _period_ is the same; the start and end dates are offset by an
> > identical amount ;-)
> 
> That offset being 37 seconds.
> 
> I've submitted it to Google's aviator log.

So the two are:
https://crt.sh/?id=30326062
https://crt.sh/?id=30736090


Kurt

_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to