On 04/10/16 14:19, Nick Lamb wrote: > That's why I proposed Mozilla might like to write this to CA/B or in > a group CA communication, because I would be astonished if WoSign and > Comodo are the only CAs to have such special "rules" that defeat the > purpose of the validation step, or if this is the only such "rule" in > use today.
The existence of such rules is due to the open-ended nature of the pre-ballot-169 validation options. Once we get ballot 169 out from the IPR quagmire, the opportunity to have such rules in this crucial area will be gone. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
