Yep, no issue here anymore. Josh Aas hadn't posted on hacker news when I sent 
this.

Thanks,
Tony


Tony Zhaocheng Tan | t...@tonytan.io | PGP Key
-------- Original Message --------
On Feb 22, 2017, 7:30 PM, Gervase Markham wrote:

On 22/02/17 14:42, Tony Zhaocheng Tan wrote:
> On 2017-01-03, Let's Encrypt issued a certificate for apple-id-2.com.
> However, until today, the domain apple-id-2.com has apparently never
> been registered. How was the certificate issued?

On Hacker News, Josh Aas writes:

"Head of Let's Encrypt here. Our team is looking into this and so far we
don't see any evidence of mis-issuance in our logs. It looks like the
domain in question, 'apple-id-2.com', was registered and DNS resolved
for it successfully at time of issuance. Here is the valid authorization
record including the resolved IP addresses for 'apple-id-2.com':

https://acme-v01.api.letsencrypt.org/acme/authz/uZGv2KXUJ6Hl...

We can't be sure why the reporter was unable to find a WHOIS record, we
can only confirm that validation properly succeeded at time of issuance.

Update: Squarespace has confirmed that they did register the domain and
then released it after getting a certificate from us."

There is currently an entry in WHOIS, because some well-meaning but
unhelpful person registered it today. I assume that if a domain is
registered and then released, and then re-registered, the "Creation"
date is of the re-registration, not the first ever registration.

So unless someone can show it was unregistered at the time of issuance,
I don't see an issue here.

Gerv
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to