That would be fine. Also, we have given Intesa Sanpaolo a scheduled revocation date of 15 August 2017, and I'm waiting to hear back.
-----Original Message----- From: dev-security-policy [mailto:dev-security-policy-bounces+ben=digicert....@lists.mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Nick Lamb via dev-security-policy Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 10:34 AM To: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org Subject: Re: Certificate with invalid dnsName issued from Baltimore intermediate On Monday, 24 July 2017 17:34:03 UTC+1, Ben Wilson wrote: > Nick, > We are in discussions with Intesa Sanpaolo about implementing/pursuing > OneCRL or a similar approach (e.g. outright revocation of the CAs). > Thanks, > Ben Is there any progress on this? To be honest I was more meaning that Mozilla (Gerv?) should just add this subCA to OneCRL and be done with it. _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
