That would be fine.  Also, we have given Intesa Sanpaolo a scheduled
revocation date of 15 August 2017, and I'm waiting to hear back.

-----Original Message-----
From: dev-security-policy
[mailto:dev-security-policy-bounces+ben=digicert....@lists.mozilla.org] On
Behalf Of Nick Lamb via dev-security-policy
Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 10:34 AM
To: mozilla-dev-security-pol...@lists.mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Certificate with invalid dnsName issued from Baltimore
intermediate

On Monday, 24 July 2017 17:34:03 UTC+1, Ben Wilson  wrote:
> Nick,
> We are in discussions with Intesa Sanpaolo about implementing/pursuing 
> OneCRL or a similar approach (e.g. outright revocation of the CAs).
> Thanks,
> Ben

Is there any progress on this? To be honest I was more meaning that Mozilla
(Gerv?) should just add this subCA to OneCRL and be done with it.

_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to