On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 10:41 AM Jakob Bohm via dev-security-policy < [email protected]> wrote:
> > He described three combined conditions to be met. You've described a > > situation "What if you meet two, but not three". I believe that was > > originally captured in his question, so what new information is being > asked > > about here? > > > > Using Firefox policies to reconfigure the browser is not a relevant > alternative for genuinely public web servers in the age of HTTPS- > everywhere. That's the difference from the other combinations. > I'm sorry, but I still fail to see the question there. That seems to be a statement of opinion. Do you believe it's mischaracterizing your question as effectively restating "What happens if you meet two, but not all three?" If you do, perhaps you could help clarify what your original question is, without any statement about what you believe or presume the answer to be. That seems the best way to get the information you feel is lacking. _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
