I would just like to remind you all the universally accepted concept of 
"Presumption of innocence". Quoting from 

>The presumption of innocence is the legal principle that one is considered 
>innocent unless proven guilty. It was traditionally expressed by the Latin 
>maxim ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat (“the burden of proof is 
>on the one who declares, not on one who denies”). 

Where it is useful to highlight the following phrases: 

- one is considered innocent unless *proven* guilty 
- the *burden of proof is on the one who declares*, not on one who denies 

So, unless MDSP is the jury responsible for proving DM guilty, I think they 
should be accepted until their mischief can be proved, although I'm not sure 
who should/could be responsible for such a task.
dev-security-policy mailing list

Reply via email to