On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:33 AM Wayne Thayer <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nadim and Matthew, > > Can you explain and provide examples for how this "set of empirical > requirements" differs from the objective requirements that currently exist? > Hi, Wayne, I think the matter of whether or not I could or should opine on that question essentially turns on events for which we don't yet have outcomes. Specifically, if the decision is made that the current DarkMatter intermediates do not require revocation and listing in OneCRL or if that action is taken but without further prejudice to their root inclusion request (say, for example, by mutual consent of the program and DarkMatter that it would be acceptable to move forward without prejudice on a new root hierarchy), then I would believe that objective policy as set out had been followed and so there would be no delta versus current policy for me to propose. If, at the other extreme end, the intermediate is revoked and OneCRL'ed with prejudice to continuing the root inclusion request AND the stated cause were rooted principally in a subjective perception of the organization versus objective data points, I would propose significant changes. _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
