On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 9:49 PM Ryan Sleevi <r...@sleevi.com> wrote: > I consider that only a single CA has represented any ambiguity as being > their explanation as to why the non-compliance existed, and even then, > clarifications to resolve that ambiguity already existed, had they simply > been sought. >
Please contemplate this question, which is intended as rhetorical, in the most generous and non-judgmental light possible. Have you contemplated the possibility that only one CA attempted to do so because you've stated your interpretation and because they're subject to your judgement and mercy, rather than because the text as written reflects a single objective mechanism which matches your own position? _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
