On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:54 PM Matthew Hardeman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 9:49 PM Ryan Sleevi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I consider that only a single CA has represented any ambiguity as being >> their explanation as to why the non-compliance existed, and even then, >> clarifications to resolve that ambiguity already existed, had they simply >> been sought. >> > > Please contemplate this question, which is intended as rhetorical, in the > most generous and non-judgmental light possible. Have you contemplated the > possibility that only one CA attempted to do so because you've stated your > interpretation and because they're subject to your judgement and mercy, > rather than because the text as written reflects a single objective > mechanism which matches your own position? > I consider the matter more than settled, based on the clear historic evidence, so I see no value in engaging further. > _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
