* whatever the legislation of a sovereign state it can hardly be a browser's 
remit to govern the state's citizen by hard coding a block, preventing those 
not participating in this panel discussion to install the certificate(s) if 
they would desire to do so (for whatever reason that may be and that may seem 
inexplicable/controversial to anyone petitioning for a hard coded block)
* whether the relatively few opinions, compared to the electorate of a state, 
in this panel discussion are (a) representative (majority) of said electorate 
is debatable
* if this becomes a test case for defying the legislation of a sovereign state 
and a hard coded block is elected then it will have to be replicated so without 
bias for any other state that aspires a similar measure, regardless of such 
state's state of domestic affairs. Else it would taint the renown instilled in 
the trust lender (certificate store)
* are there any such petitions made to other vendors, or panel discussions held 
with such vendors, that provide certificate stores, such as Google, Apple, 
Microsoft? 
* what would be the measurable impact in terms of users if only Mozilla 
implements a hard coded block?
* and if this discussion is meant to put a spotlight on MitM (at least the the 
topic's subject would imply as such and if not then please pardon/ignore the 
digression) as well then perhaps consider that the majority of users is 
blisfully unaware when their TLS connections are being termniated (decrypted) 
midair whilst reaching a host that is being served through reverse proxy 
providers (cue SNI). Here the remote host allows the reverse proxy to decrypt 
the traffic at its edge server and thus all the traffic is accessible in the 
clear to the reverse proxy provider (MitM). Whether the intentions of a reverse 
proxy provider are more sublime than a state probably lies in the eye of the 
beholder and likely vary as much.
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
dev-security-policy@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to