While you’re addressing comments, I’d appreciate an answer to my question here: what was the motivation behind redacting that portion of the email to customers, if not to conceal information related to redaction procedures?
You want to make it clear that you aren’t concealing anything, but you haven’t given us any reason to believe otherwise. Mike On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 5:01 PM Mike Shaver <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 4:55 PM 'Bruce Morton' via > [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Amir, we will respond to the comments from the community, but I want to >> make it clear that Entrust was absolutely NOT trying to "conceal" anything >> related to how we do revocation >> > You redacted a part of the email about how customers were to go about > reissuing and revoking, which is *literally* concealing something related > to revocation. That’s what redacting is. It’s the only reason that anything > is ever redacted. What are you even trying to say here? > > The redacted section provides specific instructions to our subscribers on >> how to revoke and reissue certificates. >> > cool, cool > > Why was it important to redact that section? It has no confidential > information in it as far as I can tell. > > I exhort you, for your own sake, to seriously read my guidance in > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1886532#c64 as to how to > properly communicate the reasons for, and details of, the changes that are > being listed as things that will improve Entrust’s operations. > > Mike > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-security-policy/CADQzZqsBGFtYXejenwaiMTm9NSBgHtY-hkTu6CNtC7GOQ1Shvg%40mail.gmail.com.
