Gervase Markham wrote: > Number of businesses != number of transactions, as I've pointed out
You can point out the same thing over and over, but where is the proof of your statement? Sure the top 1% will have a lot of transactions, but the other 99% will have combined a lot of transactions as well. > Of course they can. But no jeweller buys a $10,000 diamond for $100,000. Apples and oranges, if it costs a phisher $10,000 to obtain a EV cert, and he still makes $100k, then the cost of doing business in this manner is still worth it. You aren't dealing with one transaction here, you are dealing with multiple, so if the dealer buys 1 diamond for $100k, and sells it to 1000 for $10k, he's still in front... -- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://e164.org - Because e164.arpa is a tax on VoIP "In the long run the pessimist may be proved right, but the optimist has a better time on the trip." _______________________________________________ dev-security mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security
