Frank Hecker wrote: > As I wrote previously, I don't want to parse this too closely, but I > think the situation may be as follows: > > * WebTrust EV audits completed by June 12, 2007 would have used the > draft 11 guidelines. > > * WebTrust EV audits started before June 12, 2007 but completed after > that date would have used the draft 11 guidelines and then switched to > the 1.0 guidelines after their adoption. > > * WebTrust EV audits started after June 12, 2007 would have used the 1.0 > guidelines. > > In terms of revising our policy I don't think it really matters. We'd > just consider the draft 11 and 1.0 guidelines to both be acceptable (at > least until some future date), and we wouldn't need to determine exactly > which version of the guidelines was used when. > > To make this more concrete, I'll file a bug with a proposed policy > change to reflect this line of thinking. OK. Please send me the bug number for reference, thanks!
-- Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org> Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Blog: Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org> Phone: +1.213.341.0390 _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto