Frank Hecker wrote:
> As I wrote previously, I don't want to parse this too closely, but I 
> think the situation may be as follows:
>
> * WebTrust EV audits completed by June 12, 2007 would have used the 
> draft 11 guidelines.
>
> * WebTrust EV audits started before June 12, 2007 but completed after 
> that date would have used the draft 11 guidelines and then switched to 
> the 1.0 guidelines after their adoption.
>
> * WebTrust EV audits started after June 12, 2007 would have used the 1.0 
> guidelines.
>
> In terms of revising our policy I don't think it really matters. We'd 
> just consider the draft 11 and 1.0 guidelines to both be acceptable (at 
> least until some future date), and we wouldn't need to determine exactly 
> which version of the guidelines was used when.
>
> To make this more concrete, I'll file a bug with a proposed policy 
> change to reflect this line of thinking.
OK. Please send me the bug number for reference, thanks!

-- 
Regards 
 
Signer:         Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
Jabber:         [EMAIL PROTECTED] <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Blog:   Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Phone:          +1.213.341.0390
 

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to