Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Regarding your description of the HTML spec as being faulty (and
Christian's insinuated "there is no such specification necessary")
What Christian said ...
See my response to Christian.
Anyone can ask for clarification on HTML -- the mailing list is public.
Up until recently, everyone could get equal-opportunity ignored too. ;)
I recall one instance in a bug, which I don't recall, where it was
commented that support on it was being held up pending clarification
from W3C and that someone from Mozilla was going to contact them. It was
this I based myself on. I thought that there was, since being a W3C
member, some avenue to contact inside W3C Group members (CSS in that
instance, IIRC). Are you saying that Mozilla has only the same mailing
list available to everyone else?
The HTML Specification (along with the HTML DTD) is the Bible
I'm sorry you feel that way, actually. ;)
I never said that the Bible was written in stone. ;-)
I was not aware, nor am I surprised, that *noscript* rendering differs
from the specifications.
HTML 5 will have its problems as well and maintenance will be important.
The Standard is Excellence.
The Goal is Perfection.
The Reality is Murphy.
(Can we somehow build this into the Manifesto?) ;-)
--
Gus
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-layout mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
