Looks like there's no compelling reason to unship.

Retracting.

-Manish Goregaokar

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Manish Goregaokar <manishsm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > Is the only reason that no one else supports it?
>
> Yes. (which makes me suspect that nobody uses it)
>
>
> However, as mentioned, Chrome *has* added support, it's not stable yet.
>
>
> -Manish Goregaokar
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:19 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:
>
>> On 2/28/18 2:02 AM, Manish Goregaokar wrote:
>>
>>> Oh, you're asking for it to continue to work with semantic HTML?
>>>
>>
>> I'm saying that this feature is there for actual data tables.  And that
>> the suggestion that Grid is a replacement is not actually helpful given
>> that.
>>
>> That won't work, you'd need to create a new table with grid stuff.
>>>
>>
>> Seems to me that asking people to do this for an actual data table is
>> just as bad as asking people to use tables for layout.  ;)
>>
>> In that case we probably shouldn't unship?
>>>
>>
>> The one thing I haven't seen so far is why we should unship, really.  Is
>> the only reason that no one else supports it?  (To be clear, this can
>> absolutely be a valid reason, especially if the other UAs have explicitly
>> said they will not add support or the feature causes some other problems
>> too, in terms of either implementation or the health of the web.)
>>
>>
>> -Boris
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-tech-layout mailing list
>> dev-tech-layout@lists.mozilla.org
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-layout mailing list
dev-tech-layout@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-layout

Reply via email to