On Feb 19, 2014 1:52 PM, "Stormy Peters" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Bill Maggs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Adding to Kumar's voice here, we can be more opinionated, but can't just > > say it's MoCo that is doing the recommendations. I think Mozilla has a good > > track record of the community being clearly identified as the source, and > > we can do that here, too. Especially since in the framework-crazy world of > > today, we are sure to piss some developers off with any choice, however > > well thought through. > > > > I think we can make recommendations in a non-exclusive way. We can say > "Hey, you need an offline solution, here's one we tried that works well." > If people have suggestions or recommendations to make, we have writers that > can help frame it appropriately.
Yes, I want to be very careful not to have developers get the impression that we are saying "developing for FirefoxOS, then you should use one of these libraries". We should make it clear that our app platform is the web. Anything that works on the web works here too. But here are some libraries that we've found works well to solve problem X. / Jonas _______________________________________________ dev-webapps mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-webapps
