On 19 Feb 2014, at 21:51, Stormy Peters <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Bill Maggs <[email protected]> wrote: > Adding to Kumar's voice here, we can be more opinionated, but can't just say > it's MoCo that is doing the recommendations. I think Mozilla has a good track > record of the community being clearly identified as the source, and we can do > that here, too. Especially since in the framework-crazy world of today, we > are sure to piss some developers off with any choice, however well thought > through. > > I think we can make recommendations in a non-exclusive way. We can say "Hey, > you need an offline solution, here's one we tried that works well." If people > have suggestions or recommendations to make, we have writers that can help > frame it appropriately. amen to that. It needs to be recommended, not endorsed or insisted upon. People will always have their own loves and hates. Part of the app center restructure will be to include a “Recommended tools" top level menu item to cover Mozilla tools and app development workflow, but also “how to build an app with framework x, y and z”, including common gotchas and recommended frameworks for those who want a recommendation. _______________________________________________ dev-webapps mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-webapps
