Yes, I can't claim this version is peer reviewed. A second link is like a great idea. I'll get the change up on staging.
Thanks for the feedback. On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > I think it's worth maintaining a pointer to the peer reviewed version. > > How about leave the current link with the IEEE and peer reviewed bits, then > add a follow on entry that bears teh note "updated to include foo" that > does not have the peer-reviewed marker? > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Jeremy Kepner <kep...@ll.mit.edu> wrote: > > > So the only question would be how you would fill out the "Peer-Reviewed" > > column. > > > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 05:46:47PM -0500, Drew Farris wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > There is an updated version of the paper "Benchmarking Apache Accumulo > > > BigData Distributed Table Store Using Its Continuous Test Suite" that's > > > currently linked in the papers section of the Accumulo website. > > > > > > Would anyone object to me updating the link? I believe I have the > > necessary > > > karma to do so, but was reluctant to do so without first informing the > > > community of my intent.. > > > > > > This version has been edited for clarity, structure and includes > results > > > from running the tests described on the paper on Amazon EC2. It no > longer > > > bears the IEEE Big Data mark. > > > > > > The new link is http://sqrrl.com/media/accumulo-benchmarking-2.1.pdf > > > > > > Drew > > > > > > -- > Sean >
