+1 publish that sucker. Thanks for updating the site with the new paper.
Drew Farris wrote:
Ok, http://accumulo.staging.apache.org/papers.html is updated with a
reference to the updated paper, I'll publish tomorrow if there are no
objections..
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Drew Farris<drew.far...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, I can't claim this version is peer reviewed. A second link is like a
great idea. I'll get the change up on staging.
Thanks for the feedback.
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Sean Busbey<bus...@cloudera.com> wrote:
I think it's worth maintaining a pointer to the peer reviewed version.
How about leave the current link with the IEEE and peer reviewed bits,
then
add a follow on entry that bears teh note "updated to include foo" that
does not have the peer-reviewed marker?
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Jeremy Kepner<kep...@ll.mit.edu> wrote:
So the only question would be how you would fill out the "Peer-Reviewed"
column.
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 05:46:47PM -0500, Drew Farris wrote:
Hi All,
There is an updated version of the paper "Benchmarking Apache Accumulo
BigData Distributed Table Store Using Its Continuous Test Suite"
that's
currently linked in the papers section of the Accumulo website.
Would anyone object to me updating the link? I believe I have the
necessary
karma to do so, but was reluctant to do so without first informing the
community of my intent..
This version has been edited for clarity, structure and includes
results
from running the tests described on the paper on Amazon EC2. It no
longer
bears the IEEE Big Data mark.
The new link is http://sqrrl.com/media/accumulo-benchmarking-2.1.pdf
Drew
--
Sean
