Ok, http://accumulo.staging.apache.org/papers.html is updated with a reference to the updated paper, I'll publish tomorrow if there are no objections..
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Drew Farris <drew.far...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, I can't claim this version is peer reviewed. A second link is like a > great idea. I'll get the change up on staging. > > Thanks for the feedback. > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Sean Busbey <bus...@cloudera.com> wrote: > >> I think it's worth maintaining a pointer to the peer reviewed version. >> >> How about leave the current link with the IEEE and peer reviewed bits, >> then >> add a follow on entry that bears teh note "updated to include foo" that >> does not have the peer-reviewed marker? >> >> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 5:09 PM, Jeremy Kepner <kep...@ll.mit.edu> wrote: >> >> > So the only question would be how you would fill out the "Peer-Reviewed" >> > column. >> > >> > On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 05:46:47PM -0500, Drew Farris wrote: >> > > Hi All, >> > > >> > > There is an updated version of the paper "Benchmarking Apache Accumulo >> > > BigData Distributed Table Store Using Its Continuous Test Suite" >> that's >> > > currently linked in the papers section of the Accumulo website. >> > > >> > > Would anyone object to me updating the link? I believe I have the >> > necessary >> > > karma to do so, but was reluctant to do so without first informing the >> > > community of my intent.. >> > > >> > > This version has been edited for clarity, structure and includes >> results >> > > from running the tests described on the paper on Amazon EC2. It no >> longer >> > > bears the IEEE Big Data mark. >> > > >> > > The new link is http://sqrrl.com/media/accumulo-benchmarking-2.1.pdf >> > > >> > > Drew >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Sean >> > >
