I will follow up on both of those tickets with my objections, please do not apply them.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > My intention is to, sometime this week, take a thorough look at the patches > and reviews available for ACCUMULO-3177 (create a per-table VolumeChooser) > and ACCUMULO-3178 (example implementation of an alternate > VolumeChooser/test case for ACCUMULO-3177). Given the discussions > surrounding ACCUMULO-3176, and because they originated as the overall > ACCUMULO-3089 (which had some objections that may not have been resolved) I > wanted to give this notice, to ensure that there is opportunity for > objections to occur and be discussed here first. > > Presumably, the objections for ACCUMULO-3176 are different from any that > might be held for 3177 and 3178, but there was limited follow-up > clarification of the objections raised after the issues were re-scoped as > separate, more specific, JIRA sub-tasks. So, I'm not sure there are any > still outstanding for those. Since the reviews are still open for those, I > just wanted to invite discussion either here, or (perhaps even better) in > the specific review in ReviewBoard. > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > -- Sean
