I will be as timely as I can. Please keep in mind that our community is volunteer based, people have a multitude of commitments, and it is a holiday week.
I had presumed more feedback wasn't pressing since no one had mentioned on the tickets how my original concerns were addressed by the revamps. If someone could give me a summary on each it would make things go much faster. -- Sean On Nov 26, 2014 12:27 PM, "Christopher" <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for your response. I request that you please be timely, as these > issues have sat idle for a long time, and the maintenance burden of keeping > them current with the HEAD of master is becoming excessive. I await your > reviews/objections. Thanks. > > > -- > Christopher L Tubbs II > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I will follow up on both of those tickets with my objections, please do > not > > apply them. > > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > My intention is to, sometime this week, take a thorough look at the > > patches > > > and reviews available for ACCUMULO-3177 (create a per-table > > VolumeChooser) > > > and ACCUMULO-3178 (example implementation of an alternate > > > VolumeChooser/test case for ACCUMULO-3177). Given the discussions > > > surrounding ACCUMULO-3176, and because they originated as the overall > > > ACCUMULO-3089 (which had some objections that may not have been > > resolved) I > > > wanted to give this notice, to ensure that there is opportunity for > > > objections to occur and be discussed here first. > > > > > > Presumably, the objections for ACCUMULO-3176 are different from any > that > > > might be held for 3177 and 3178, but there was limited follow-up > > > clarification of the objections raised after the issues were re-scoped > as > > > separate, more specific, JIRA sub-tasks. So, I'm not sure there are any > > > still outstanding for those. Since the reviews are still open for > those, > > I > > > just wanted to invite discussion either here, or (perhaps even better) > in > > > the specific review in ReviewBoard. > > > > > > -- > > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sean > > >
