Thank you for your response. I request that you please be timely, as these issues have sat idle for a long time, and the maintenance burden of keeping them current with the HEAD of master is becoming excessive. I await your reviews/objections. Thanks.
-- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > I will follow up on both of those tickets with my objections, please do not > apply them. > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My intention is to, sometime this week, take a thorough look at the > patches > > and reviews available for ACCUMULO-3177 (create a per-table > VolumeChooser) > > and ACCUMULO-3178 (example implementation of an alternate > > VolumeChooser/test case for ACCUMULO-3177). Given the discussions > > surrounding ACCUMULO-3176, and because they originated as the overall > > ACCUMULO-3089 (which had some objections that may not have been > resolved) I > > wanted to give this notice, to ensure that there is opportunity for > > objections to occur and be discussed here first. > > > > Presumably, the objections for ACCUMULO-3176 are different from any that > > might be held for 3177 and 3178, but there was limited follow-up > > clarification of the objections raised after the issues were re-scoped as > > separate, more specific, JIRA sub-tasks. So, I'm not sure there are any > > still outstanding for those. Since the reviews are still open for those, > I > > just wanted to invite discussion either here, or (perhaps even better) in > > the specific review in ReviewBoard. > > > > -- > > Christopher L Tubbs II > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > > > > > > -- > Sean >
