This must be a periodic failure, because Jenkins just successfully ran it. However, it fails more often than not for me.
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 4:57 PM Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, those VolumeITs are brutal to reason about. If you get stuck, > leave a note on JIRA. I can try to find some time this weekend to dig in. > > Christopher wrote: > > I'm currently bisecting to figure out what's going on with ACCUMULO-4425. > > The test isn't very well documented, and there's no server-side problems, > > so I'm trying to infer from code what the test conditions the test is > > trying to evaluate actually are. We need to do a better job of commenting > > to explain what the goal of the test is. > > > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:47 AM Sean Busbey<[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> yeah, any of mine are fine for bumping. They've been a problem for a > while. > >> > >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Josh Elser<[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> I would assume that ACCUMULO-4422 can be bumped as it's not a blocker, > >> but I > >>> should be able to run the tests I had asked Sean to do locally here and > >>> speed things up. > >>> > >>> I think I also owe Sean a read through on ACCUMULO-4421. Let me try to > >> help > >>> there too. > >>> > >>> > >>> Michael Wall wrote: > >>>> I was going to make another RC for 1.8.0, but we have open 4 tickets. > >> See > >>>> 1.8.0 > >>>> < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO/fixforversion/12329879> > >>>> > >>>> Dave, Sean and Christopher, please take a look at these tickets and > move > >>>> them to 1.8.1 or let me know a timeframe for completion? I can take a > >>>> look > >>>> at ACCUMULO-4425<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4425> > >>>> since > >>>> it is unassigned if it need to stay in 1.8.0. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> > >>>> Mike > >>>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> busbey > >> > > >
