+1 On 5/15/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The volume of Camel related mails are rising and increasingly Camel folks are talking about stuff thats unrelated to ActiveMQ. Given how busy the ActiveMQ lists are (particularly the user lists) I'm starting to worry about missing Camel related traffic in the deluge of ActiveMQ related user mail. So I'm thinking its worth having separate mailing lists for Camel related traffic which would also ease the email burden on forks using either code bases. [ ] +1 to create camel-dev, camel-user, camel-commits mailing lists [ ] -1 I disagree because: _________ Here's my +1 -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Principal Engineer, IONA Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
