+1 good idea :-)
On 5/15/07, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 On 5/15/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The volume of Camel related mails are rising and increasingly Camel > folks are talking about stuff thats unrelated to ActiveMQ. Given how > busy the ActiveMQ lists are (particularly the user lists) I'm starting > to worry about missing Camel related traffic in the deluge of ActiveMQ > related user mail. > > So I'm thinking its worth having separate mailing lists for Camel > related traffic which would also ease the email burden on forks using > either code bases. > > [ ] +1 to create camel-dev, camel-user, camel-commits mailing lists > [ ] -1 I disagree because: _________ > > > Here's my +1 > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
