James Strachan wrote: > The volume of Camel related mails are rising and increasingly Camel > folks are talking about stuff thats unrelated to ActiveMQ. Given how > busy the ActiveMQ lists are (particularly the user lists) I'm starting > to worry about missing Camel related traffic in the deluge of ActiveMQ > related user mail. > > So I'm thinking its worth having separate mailing lists for Camel > related traffic which would also ease the email burden on forks using > either code bases.
It would also be nice to separate .NET and CPP from Java. :) -- Christopher G. Stach II
