In the sandbox 6.0, protobuf is set up as an independent project
embedded in the regular amq svn tree. This is a bad idea since svn
tags of activemq will include the protobuf code at an unrelated
version number.
Either protobuf should be definitely part of 6.0 and have a 6.0
version or it should be somewhere separate in svn.
If you want separate projects but build convenience then check out
both projects into a common directory and put a pom there to build
both amq and protobuf and don't check that into svn.
Which is intended?
For now I've assumed that a common parent is intended and pretty much
cut out the protobuf-pom but left the protobuf version at 1.1-
SNAPSHOT. This is not a suitable permanent solution.
thanks
david jencks
- intended project structure for protobuf in 6.0? David Jencks
-