In the sandbox 6.0, protobuf is set up as an independent project embedded in the regular amq svn tree. This is a bad idea since svn tags of activemq will include the protobuf code at an unrelated version number.

Either protobuf should be definitely part of 6.0 and have a 6.0 version or it should be somewhere separate in svn.

If you want separate projects but build convenience then check out both projects into a common directory and put a pom there to build both amq and protobuf and don't check that into svn.

Which is intended?

For now I've assumed that a common parent is intended and pretty much cut out the protobuf-pom but left the protobuf version at 1.1- SNAPSHOT. This is not a suitable permanent solution.

thanks
david jencks

Reply via email to