Hi David, is switch to maven 2.0.10 is mandatory? It makes problems with Hudson builds, since it's still on Maven 2.0.9 (at least I couldn't make it build with these changes).
The other option is to ask Hudson administrators to add 2.0.10 option. Regards Dejan djencks wrote: > > OK, I resuscitated it as a embedded project ready to move out, in rev > 787447. > > Someone who knows more history than I needs to look at the root > LICENSE and NOTICE files for both activemq-flow and activemq-protobuf > and fix them so they are accurate for the actual code in svn. > > Let me know if there are more problems... > thanks > david jencks > > On Jun 22, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > >> Hi David, >> >> I think in the longer term (Before ActiveMQ 6.0 goes out the door) >> protobuf >> will once again be spun out to be in it's own independently released >> module. For now it was brought it as we wanted to refactor some >> bits in for >> the AMQ 6 stuff (for example it's Buffer abstractions are getting >> moved into >> a common util module). >> >> Regards, >> Hiram >> >> On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:07 AM, David Jencks >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> In the sandbox 6.0, protobuf is set up as an independent project >>> embedded >>> in the regular amq svn tree. This is a bad idea since svn tags of >>> activemq >>> will include the protobuf code at an unrelated version number. >>> >>> Either protobuf should be definitely part of 6.0 and have a 6.0 >>> version or >>> it should be somewhere separate in svn. >>> >>> If you want separate projects but build convenience then check out >>> both >>> projects into a common directory and put a pom there to build both >>> amq and >>> protobuf and don't check that into svn. >>> >>> Which is intended? >>> >>> For now I've assumed that a common parent is intended and pretty >>> much cut >>> out the protobuf-pom but left the protobuf version at 1.1- >>> SNAPSHOT. This is >>> not a suitable permanent solution. >>> >>> thanks >>> david jencks >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Hiram >> >> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com >> >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com/ > > ----- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/intended-project-structure-for-protobuf-in-6.0--tp24122957p24167336.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
