OK, I resuscitated it as a embedded project ready to move out, in rev
787447.
Someone who knows more history than I needs to look at the root
LICENSE and NOTICE files for both activemq-flow and activemq-protobuf
and fix them so they are accurate for the actual code in svn.
Let me know if there are more problems...
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 22, 2009, at 10:03 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi David,
I think in the longer term (Before ActiveMQ 6.0 goes out the door)
protobuf
will once again be spun out to be in it's own independently released
module. For now it was brought it as we wanted to refactor some
bits in for
the AMQ 6 stuff (for example it's Buffer abstractions are getting
moved into
a common util module).
Regards,
Hiram
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 4:07 AM, David Jencks
<[email protected]>wrote:
In the sandbox 6.0, protobuf is set up as an independent project
embedded
in the regular amq svn tree. This is a bad idea since svn tags of
activemq
will include the protobuf code at an unrelated version number.
Either protobuf should be definitely part of 6.0 and have a 6.0
version or
it should be somewhere separate in svn.
If you want separate projects but build convenience then check out
both
projects into a common directory and put a pom there to build both
amq and
protobuf and don't check that into svn.
Which is intended?
For now I've assumed that a common parent is intended and pretty
much cut
out the protobuf-pom but left the protobuf version at 1.1-
SNAPSHOT. This is
not a suitable permanent solution.
thanks
david jencks
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/
