Hey Dejan, FYI, I'm running the RC though the Progress internal performance test suite over the weekend. Will advise of the results, but it should be interesting to see how the new default config performs, and we can see if we need to tweak it.
Colin -----Original Message----- From: chubr...@gmail.com [mailto:chubr...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Dejan Bosanac Sent: Friday, September 18, 2009 11:14 AM To: dev@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] AciveMQ Protocol Buffers 1.0 and Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.0 releases Ok, I'll modify tomorrow how we create source release and include protobuf code in it. I guess I'll need to tweak assembly-plugin and apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor, but have to research it more on how to do it. If anybody has any experience with this and would provide any pointers it would be very helpful. Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Hiram Chirino <chir...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah that that does not have the source tar ball for the protobuf release. > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com > >wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Hiram Chirino <chir...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Could you also post links to the source tarballs? Thanks! > > > > He already did: > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/activemq-staging-030/org/ apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.3.0/ > > > > Bruce > > -- > > perl -e 'print > > unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" > > );' > > > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ > > Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder > > > > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com/ >
