Hi, I'm canceling this release because of source archive problem.
As we're waiting for Colin's tests to finish and we will possibly have some tweaking in the default configs, I would like to use this time window to release protobuf 1.0 in a separate release and thus avoid this issue of including protobuf source in activemq release. I've merged David's changes in the protobuf release and adapted it a bit more. It builds fine from source release and activemq (5.3 branch) builds and runs fine with it. I'll run a full activemq 5.3 branch build with it on Monday. I'm starting a new vote for this on a new thread. Thank you all for your help -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:20 AM, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>wrote: > IMO since you aren't building protbuf as part of amq, it is a separate > bunch of stuff and a separate release with a separate source archive. If > you want a single source archive, put the protobuf modules inside the amq > tree and link up the build. > > I think I already set up the protobuf build inside amq 6 to the new style > stuff, sorry I missed this one, but should be easy to merge the changes. > > So this means I'm -1 on these releases since the source archive is a > required part of the release. > > thanks > david jencks > > > > On Sep 18, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote: > > Ok, I'll modify tomorrow how we create source release and include protobuf >> code in it. I guess I'll need to tweak assembly-plugin and >> apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor, but have to research it more on >> how to do it. If anybody has any experience with this and would provide >> any >> pointers it would be very helpful. >> >> Cheers >> -- >> Dejan Bosanac >> >> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ >> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Hiram Chirino <chir...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Yeah that that does not have the source tar ball for the protobuf >>> release. >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Bruce Snyder <bruce.sny...@gmail.com >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Hiram Chirino <chir...@gmail.com> >>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Could you also post links to the source tarballs? Thanks! >>>>> >>>> >>>> He already did: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/activemq-staging-030/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.3.0/ >>> >>>> >>>> Bruce >>>> -- >>>> perl -e 'print >>>> unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*" >>>> );' >>>> >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ >>>> Blog: http://bruceblog.org/ >>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Hiram >>> >>> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com >>> >>> Open Source SOA >>> http://fusesource.com/ >>> >>> >
