IMO since you aren't building protbuf as part of amq, it is a separate
bunch of stuff and a separate release with a separate source archive.
If you want a single source archive, put the protobuf modules inside
the amq tree and link up the build.
I think I already set up the protobuf build inside amq 6 to the new
style stuff, sorry I missed this one, but should be easy to merge the
changes.
So this means I'm -1 on these releases since the source archive is a
required part of the release.
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 18, 2009, at 11:13 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
Ok, I'll modify tomorrow how we create source release and include
protobuf
code in it. I guess I'll need to tweak assembly-plugin and
apache-source-release-assembly-descriptor, but have to research it
more on
how to do it. If anybody has any experience with this and would
provide any
pointers it would be very helpful.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:02 PM, Hiram Chirino <chir...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Yeah that that does not have the source tar ball for the protobuf
release.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Bruce Snyder
<bruce.sny...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Hiram Chirino <chir...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Could you also post links to the source tarballs? Thanks!
He already did:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/activemq-staging-030/org/apache/activemq/activemq-parent/5.3.0/
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print
unpack("u30","D0G)u8...@4vyy9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
ActiveMQ in Action: http://bit.ly/2je6cQ
Blog: http://bruceblog.org/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/brucesnyder
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Open Source SOA
http://fusesource.com/
