Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ? On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <[email protected]> wrote:
> I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi and > use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix for a > minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade from > 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi and > add activemq-camel. What do you guys think? > > Regards > -- > Dejan Bosanac > ---------------------- > Red Hat, Inc. > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > [email protected] > Twitter: @dejanb > Blog: http://sensatic.net > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Would there be a chance to take a look at >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1 release? >> >> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker within >> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel. >> >> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get ClassNotFoundExceptions >> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter which was >> introduced in later versions. >> >> Regards, >> >> *Raúl Kripalani* >> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source >> Integration specialist >> http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani >> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk >> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> All good on my side. >>> >>> Regards >>> -- >>> Dejan Bosanac >>> ---------------------- >>> Red Hat, Inc. >>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat >>> [email protected] >>> Twitter: @dejanb >>> Blog: http://sensatic.net >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 - >> presumably >>>> that won’t be far away ? >>>> >>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the leveldb >>>>> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Hiram Chirino >>>>> >>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. >>>>> >>>>> [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com >>>>> >>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino >>>>> >>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo >>>> >>>> Rob Davies >>>> ———————— >>>> Red Hat, Inc >>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha >>>> Twitter: rajdavies >>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ >>>> >>>> >>> >> Rob Davies ———————— Red Hat, Inc http://hawt.io - #dontcha Twitter: rajdavies Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
