Or just explain upgrade path it in release notes. I'll get it fixed now. Regards -- Dejan Bosanac ---------------------- Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat [email protected] Twitter: @dejanb Blog: http://sensatic.net ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Davies <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ? > > On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi and > > use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix for a > > minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade from > > 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi and > > add activemq-camel. What do you guys think? > > > > Regards > > -- > > Dejan Bosanac > > ---------------------- > > Red Hat, Inc. > > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > > [email protected] > > Twitter: @dejanb > > Blog: http://sensatic.net > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Would there be a chance to take a look at > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1 release? > >> > >> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker > within > >> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel. > >> > >> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get ClassNotFoundExceptions > >> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter which > was > >> introduced in later versions. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> *Raúl Kripalani* > >> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source > >> Integration specialist > >> http://about.me/raulkripalani | > http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani > >> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk > >> > >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> All good on my side. > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> -- > >>> Dejan Bosanac > >>> ---------------------- > >>> Red Hat, Inc. > >>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > >>> [email protected] > >>> Twitter: @dejanb > >>> Blog: http://sensatic.net > >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 - > >> presumably > >>>> that won’t be far away ? > >>>> > >>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the leveldb > >>>>> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do? > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Hiram Chirino > >>>>> > >>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc. > >>>>> > >>>>> [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com > >>>>> > >>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino > >>>>> > >>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo > >>>> > >>>> Rob Davies > >>>> ———————— > >>>> Red Hat, Inc > >>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha > >>>> Twitter: rajdavies > >>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com > >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > Rob Davies > ———————— > Red Hat, Inc > http://hawt.io - #dontcha > Twitter: rajdavies > Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/ > >
