https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 is now fixed.

Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
[email protected]
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/


On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Dejan Bosanac <[email protected]> wrote:

> Or just explain upgrade path it in release notes. I'll get it fixed now.
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> ----------------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> [email protected]
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Davies <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ?
>>
>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi
>> and
>> > use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix for
>> a
>> > minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade from
>> > 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi and
>> > add activemq-camel. What do you guys think?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > --
>> > Dejan Bosanac
>> > ----------------------
>> > Red Hat, Inc.
>> > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> > [email protected]
>> > Twitter: @dejanb
>> > Blog: http://sensatic.net
>> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Would there be a chance to take a look at
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1 release?
>> >>
>> >> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker
>> within
>> >> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
>> >>
>> >> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get ClassNotFoundExceptions
>> >> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter which
>> was
>> >> introduced in later versions.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> *Raúl Kripalani*
>> >> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
>> >> Integration specialist
>> >> http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>> >> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> All good on my side.
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards
>> >>> --
>> >>> Dejan Bosanac
>> >>> ----------------------
>> >>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> >>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>> Twitter: @dejanb
>> >>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>> >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies <[email protected]>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 -
>> >> presumably
>> >>>> that won’t be far away ?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release?  I'm happy now with how the
>> leveldb
>> >>>>> bits are looking.  Any outstanding bits left to do?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Hiram Chirino
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> [email protected] | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Rob Davies
>> >>>> ————————
>> >>>> Red Hat, Inc
>> >>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>> >>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>> >>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>> >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>> Rob Davies
>> ————————
>> Red Hat, Inc
>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>> Twitter: rajdavies
>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to