On 30 Jan 2014, at 23:20, artnaseef <[email protected]> wrote: > If hawtio is a "general console" then it won't ever be a core part of > ActiveMQ, correct?
That’s up to debate by the ActiveMQ community. My view is that the console should be up to the user. > > I believe ActiveMQ needs a webconsole in its core. I believe that the end user has a choice over what console they use. There are people who want to contribute to the existing ActiveMQ web console, their are committers and PMC members (including me) who believe that the existing web console is something that needs either a complete re-write or an awful lot of work to keep it feasible. The best way forward in my opinion, to bring this thread back to the original premise of this post, is to create a sub project for the existing web console, which will allow the folks who want to drive it forward to do so at a velocity that suits them, and isn’t tied to the broker release. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-Move-the-ActiveMQ-web-console-to-a-sub-project-tp4676877p4677116.html > Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. Rob Davies ———————— Red Hat, Inc http://hawt.io - #dontcha Twitter: rajdavies Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
